Assignment 2—Argument PaperWorth 15%. Due by last day of week 12DescriptionThis assignment should help you draw together many of the skills and much of the knowledge you havegained thus far from the course. Your assignment is to design both sides of an argument that could beused as the basis for a persuasive essay. Building on the issue you researched in Assignment 1, you areto come up with opposite conclusions and show how you would go about supporting these opposites.Tasks1. Issue: Articulate a current Canadian issue in your own words. It must be expressed as a questionin a single, grammatically correct sentence. The issue must be relevant to the society as a wholeand the public decision-making process. Format example:• “Should Canada dissolve as a federation and the provinces become new States in theUSA?” (note this is not a proper example of the type of content that is suitable as this isnot an issue that is currently being debated in reputable national media sources)2. Conclusions: State two conclusions as single, grammatically correct sentences– one for eachside of the issues. Do not include reasons or qualifications that are not in the issue statement.Here is an example to illustrate format:• “Yes, Canada should dissolve as a federation and the provinces become new States inthe USA.”• “No, Canada should not dissolve as a federation and the provinces become new Statesin the USA.”3. Premise 1: In your own words, give a clear, objective, and grammatically correct sentence that isa supportive reason for the positive conclusion.4. Find a single-sentence quote that gives direct support for the positive conclusion and is basedon objective reasoning. Then, using APA format, cite the source. Here is an example to illustrateformat:• “Evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the majority of Canadians would refuse to payUS taxes, creating insurmountable political instability”. (Author, A. A., & Author, B. B.(Date of publication). Title of article. Title of Online Periodical, volume number(issuenumber if available). Retrieved from http://www.someaddress.com/full/url/5. Premise 2: Premise 1: In your own words, give a clear, objective, and grammatically correctsentence that is a supportive reason for the negative conclusion.6. Find a single-sentence quote that gives direct support for the negative conclusion and is basedon objective reasoning. Then, using APA format, cite the source. Here is an example to illustrateformat:• “Canadian Business overwhelmingly supports dissolution, according to a nationalsurvey”. (Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day). Title of article. Title of Newspaper. Retrievedfrom http://www.someaddress.com/full/url/
The post Argument Paper – NAFTA issue faced by the Canadian economy appeared first on Homework Aider.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
