Due Week 9 and worth 160 points
Continue the project plan by completing Part 4.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Analyze and provide rationale for the selection of three to five (3-5) data sources that you would expect to use in the evaluation.
  2. Provide and explain reasons for seven to ten (7-10) open-ended interview questions to ask the target population (administrators and recipients) of the program. Provide research support.
  3. Discuss three (3) issues that could be encountered in collecting, compiling, interpreting, and reporting the data. Provide research support.
  4. Recommend three (3) ways to establish and maintain effective communication with stakeholders during the evaluation. Provide research support.
  5. Recommend and provide a rationale for ways to report the data from the evaluation.
  6. Use at least three (3) peer-reviewed academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and many Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Peer-reviewed academic resources refer to articles and scholarly journals that are reviewed by a panel of experts or peers in the field. Review the video titled Research Starter: Finding Peer-Reviewed References for more information on obtaining peer-reviewed academic resources through your Blackboard course shell.
  7. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
  8. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
  9. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
  10. Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.
  11. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
  • Explore methods of gathering, analyzing, and reporting information.
  • Develop a program evaluation plan for education.
  • Write clearly and concisely about education program evaluation using proper writing mechanics.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in educational program evaluation.
  • Click here to view the grading rubric.

    APA-Plagiarism-Paraphrasing-Quoting-In-text Citing-References

    SafeAssign for Class Assignments

    SafeAssign Message: SafeAssign is a new plagiarism detection tool used by Strayer University Faculty to check submitted assignments for plagiarism.  When students upload an assignment to the Blackboard course shell the assignments submitted by the class may automatically be submitted to SafeAssign to check for plagiarism. 

    Once submitted, you will be given a percentage of the paper (in a Safe Assign Originality Report) that matches other sources.  That percentage must be 20% or below to have an acceptable submission.  (That would mean that 20% or less of the paper was copied/pasted from another site.)

    You may want to contact your Learning Resource team or refer to the Virtual Writing Center for information and tips to enhance your writing skills, learn about APA formatting, and participate in live sessions.

    Questions pertaining to SafeAssisgn can be directed to: [email protected]
    —–

    NOTE: Expectations & Important information for this and future assignments
    The ideology behind the required assignments is to test yourself, to assess your knowledge, and to serve as a testimonial that you grasped the material.  These assignments help you to grow, excel, and succeeded in the future.  In order to accomplish this, here are some guidelines to follow:

  1. Read the directions/requirements
  2. Review the rubric.  Have the rubric in front of you while your compost the paper.
  3. Check your document for plagiarism- You have access to Safe Assign, a tool to check for similarities (plagiarism).  A similarity report is populated shortly after your submit the assignment.  I strongly suggest you review/redo the assignment, if the report shows a similarity greater than 20%.  This tool is for your benefit, please use it to ensure your submission confirms to Strayer University’s requirements.  Most of all this tool will help you avoid violating the Academic Integrity Policy.
  4. Read/Review the late submission policy.  This link is located under the Student Center Tab, under the Student Course Guide section

Running Head: COMMUNICATION TO STAKEHOLDERS 1

COMMUNICATION TO STAKEHOLDERS 4

Communication to Stakeholders

Student’s Name

Institution’s Name

Affiliation;

Use of Simple and General Language

I would choose this method since it provides one with a chance to effectively discuss every point and also replies to any question that might come through during the time of presentation. During the presentation, I will use general terms when referring to conditions that might not be known by the stakeholders in question. Oral tradition also allows one to use gestures that might or leads to a better understanding of the message being presented (Huber & Pallas, 2006).

Definition of terms

In this way, I would use terms known to the experienced stakeholders, then define their meaning in the interest of the inexperienced stakeholders. This ensures that the message is gotten by all and educates the inexperienced stakeholders so that during the next presentation, the terms will be familiar.

Being Straight to The Point

This is making sure that during the preparation of the report, the key points are well spelled out without really having to go to the minor details that might or may be unnecessary to the inexperienced stakeholders. This also prevents the audience from boredom that might lead to them not paying attention to the next points that might be of more valuable (Huber & Pallas, 2006).

Ways to Address Data Change Request by New Stakeholder

At first, one has to know why the request for the change is necessary. This allows one to know if the application is for the addition of data or the elimination of some data. It also gives one a chance to evaluate the request and see if it is necessary. It also allows one to know the benefits or the disadvantages of the data. The next step after identifying the requested change and its importance if the formulation of response towards the suggested change. It also allows one to know the level of effort needed in the formulation of the proposed amendment. With that understood, one will now be able to get to know if the change increases or reduces costs in the planned budget of the project. With all that information at hand, the requested change is now ready for presentation to the team responsible for the approval of the change. When the change is approved, the teams involved in the project are notified, and the change is done. If, on the other hand, it is denied, the project continues to completion (Podnar, 2014).

References

Huber, M., & Pallas, M. (2006). Customizing Stakeholder Management Strategies: Concepts for Long-term Business Success. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.

Podnar, K. (2014). Corporate Communication: A Marketing Viewpoint. London, England: Routledge.


What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."


"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"