Introduction: A description of the assignment, the work setting, the names and functions of the internal units analyzed, the number in your sample, and how the data were gathered. b. Discussion of each of the organizational effectiveness (OE) measures included in the Organizational Performance Assessment (OPA) and used in this study. That is, describe why the measures are important indicators of organizational effectiveness. Your text has very good information about studies relating to these dimensions. You are encouraged to use the FIU online library system using various data bases within it to find academic references related to each measure. (Outside research from academic journals, as opposed to Wilkpedia or other online non-academic sources are especially encouraged and will be taken into account in the professor’s grading of the assignment: You can find academic sources within the FIU online library. Also, please contact the reference librarian or ask the professor for help when needed). c. Background: It should briefly describe relevant contextual background about the organization (i.e., its purpose/mission, history, leadership, important external or internal changes or challenges facing it, etc.). Do not make this extensive; just provide brief descriptive information about the organization. d. Research Questions: What questions does your team expect to shed light on as a result of this inquiry? That is, “Is there a difference in the perception of organizational effectiveness between departments within the organization?” Or, “What are the organization’s strengths and areas in greatest need of improvement?” Or, “Are there differences in perceptions between those who work in geographic area ‘X’ and those who work in geographic area ‘Y’?” Or, “Do those who lead the organization perceive the organization to be performing differently than do front line employees?” Etc. e. Data Analysis: This part of your paper will be handled by the online program developed by the professor and provided by him to you. Your paper should include a statement that the respondents’ ratings were tabulated and compared using analysis of variance statistical applications. The results are as follows: (then show the graphs produced by the OPA program that you deem important to your study, and give a brief descriptive analysis of them). In this section of your paper, do not infer why certain scores are high or low, just report what was found. f. Discussion of Findings: A brief discussion of the findings. Include a restatement of your research question(s) in d, above, and the evidence related to them based on your findings, addressing each research question separately. (You will have both quantitative statistical information and qualitative comments from the employees who completed the questionnaire—you may also ask additional questions if interested, but will need to contact the professor and inform him of this when first setting up the assessment for your organization). gSummary and recommendations: Write the paper as though you were an OD professional consulting team with the task of enabling the organization to improve (i.e., what are the next steps that the company might take and why?) Develop a plan to improve things. That is, what would you recommend be the next steps you would take to enable the organization to improve where improvement was needed? What theory(s) are you relying on to help you create your intervention? How would you use the scores and employee comments found on the OPA dimensions to further improve the organization? (Be both practical and use explicit theory as your guide, citing references where appropriate). The scale and all averages on charts reflect a -4 difference. h. Bibliography: (Use APA Style throughout your work—see Weeks 7 and 8 for style guidelines). i. Appendix: (if needed) Rubrics to be used to assess the quality of your paper will include: Organization of the paper, grammar, clarity of writing, use of APA style appropriately: 5 points Appropriateness of the use of course related text and relevant academic journal research related to the 10 dimensions in the OPA and recommendations sections of the paper: 5 points Demonstration of critical thinking in the analysis of the outcome: 5 points Practical relevance of recommendations for improvement, i.e., the degree to which your recommendations are theoretically and practically sound. Include discussions and outcomes your team had with the leadership of the organization analyzed (we know access to the leadership may not always be possible). 5 points
The post Department of Cemeteries and Organizational Analysis Team Term Paper Guidelines. appeared first on Homework Aider.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
