Synopsis of Supreme Court Rulings on Law and Morality – Essay Instructions
Instructions
1) Write a 800 to 1,000 word essay,
2) Provide a synopsis of the Supreme Court Rulings in Bowers v. Hardwick and Lawrence v. Texas,
3) Explain the ruling in Bowers, with particular attention to what the majority held regarding morality and law. Use Hart’s arguments on the relationship between morality and the law to support your explanation (Content 1),
4) Analyze the arguments in Lawrence that essentially overturned Bowers (Content 2),
5) Critique Justice Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence, with particular emphasis on Scalia’s claim that Lawrence essentially spells the end of all law based on morality (Content 3),
6) Given the shift in social influences that are used to determine the validity of laws, how do you see this shift impacting society (Content 4) DO NOT ADDRESS THIS PROMPT,
7) Use the following REQUIRED sub-headings: The Ruling in Bowers& Hart on Law and Morals, An Analysis of the Majority Opinion of Lawrence, Scalia’s Dissent in Lawrence,
8) DO NOT WRITE AN INTRODUCTION OR CONCLUSION,
9) Locate two to three credible sources in support of your content,
10) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
Rubric
• Content 1: 15%
• Content 2: 20%
• Content 3: 25%
• Content 4: 15% (DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THIS PROMPT – YOU ARE RECEIVING THE POINTS WITHOUT ADDRESSING IT)
• Thesis: 7% (DO NOT WRITE AN INTRODUCTION OR CONCLUSION)
• Argument Logic/Construction: 8%
• Mechanics: 5%
• Paper Formatting: 5%
• Citations: 5%
Required Sub-Headings
The Ruling in Bowers& Hart on Law and Morals
An Analysis of the Majority Opinion of Lawrence
Scalia’s Dissent in Lawrence
[Recommended} Potential Citations
Ben-Asher, N. (2014). Conferring Dignity: The Metamorphosis of the Legal Homosexual. Harvard Journal Of Law & Gender, 37243-284.
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)
Hart, H. L. A., & Hart, H. L. A. (1963). Law, liberty, and morality. Stanford University Press.
Lamparello, A. (2007). A New Method to Guide Constitutional Interpretation: Introduction “Negative Originalism”. University Of Florida Journal Of Law & Public Policy, 18(3), 383-414.
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
Rains, R. E. (2015). The Future of Justice Scalia’s Predictions of Family Law Doom. BYU Journal Of Public Law, 29353.
Sager, R. H. (2003). In Nino Veritas. American Spectator, 36(4), 20-21.
Starr, W. C. (1983). Law and Morality in HLA Hart’s Legal Philosophy. Marq. L. Rev., 67, 673.

The post Explain the ruling in Bowers, with particular attention to what the majority held regarding morality and law appeared first on Homework Aider.


What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."


"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"