Fundamentals and Applications of MicrofluidicsA complete urinalysis consists of three distinct testing phases: 1. Visual examination, which evaluates the urine’s color and clarity 2. Chemical examination, which tests chemically for about 9 substances that provide valuable information about health and disease and determines the concentration of the urine 3. Microscopic examination, which identifies and counts the type of cells, casts, crystals, and other components such as bacteria and mucus that can be present in urine https://labtestsonline.org/tests/urinalysisProject Specific StructureIntroduction: (1) Introduce the subject/problem to be solved (2) What tests exist in the market (3) How is your proposal justified as a microfluidic solution to the addressed medical challenges (4) What is the theory behind the proposed combination of testsThe design: (1) Clear description of the chip design: INTEGRATION (2) Cartoon drawings of chip components, sections (REQUIRED even if as a pencil sketch) (3) Detailed analysis of the chip functionality (4) Possible pitfalls and limitations of the design- how would you address themTesting: Clear plan for testing the chipMarketing: A clear plan of the market – market analysisMaximum 6 pagesGeotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 1 of 14 Instructions to Student • Answer all questions. Make any suitable assumptions wherever necessary. • Deadline of submission: 29/11/2020 23:59 • The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage of the assignment which is 50 marks • Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date. • Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 06/12/2020 Module Learning Outcomes The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully 1) Solve geotechnical engineering problems and analyze and interpret data. 2) Analyze the flow of water through soil via the use of flow nets and its effect below structures and through earth-dams; to use appropriate mathematical methods of analyzing geotechnical problems. 3) Work with limited information to achieve an engineering approach to the solution of problems. Assignment Objective i. To carry out the analysis and design of geotechnical structures specified in the assessment brief with considerable emphasis on sustainability and safety requirements. ii. To interpret the design outputs. iii. To submit a technical report that follows a standard report protocol. Try not to increase the pages limit more than 12-15 pages in the report (Limited to 1500 words). IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT Module Code: CIVL 0016 Module Name: Geotechnology 2 Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100 Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 2 of 14 Assignment Tasks Task 1 (5 % weightage) Submit a work proposal for this assignment on or before 02/11/2020 (23:59) which must include: • Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables. • General overview of proposed plan – initial understanding of solution to task 2. • Timeline for completion of the given tasks. The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle. Task 2 (95 % weightage) Part (A) (25 Marks) In certain location of Al Quriyat, for retaining the soil of height ‘H’, following design of mass concrete retaining wall was proposed as shown in figure 1. The wall is to be cast into the foundation soil to a depth of ‘h’ as shown. Take the unit weight of concrete as γc = 24 kN/m3 and ignore any passive resistance from the soil in front of the wall. Check the proposed design of the mass concrete retaining wall for the overturning and sliding limit states according to Eurocode 7. Figure 1: Mass concrete retaining wall with backfill. Part (B) (25 Marks) In the industrial area of Al Rusayl, a concrete foundation of width ‘B’, length ‘L’ with the depth ‘h’ deep is to be constructed at a depth of ‘d’ in a deep deposit of dense sand. Tt is subjected to a vertical line load of ‘F’ at an eccentricity of ‘e’ acting at the base of the foundation as illustrated in Figure 2. The angle of shearing resistance of the sand is ‘ ′ ′ and its unit weight is ‘’. The unit weight of concrete is 24 kN/m3 . (i) Determine the safe bearing capacity for the footing, taking F = 3.0. [10 marks] Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 3 of 14 (ii) Check the Eurocode 7 GEO limit state (Design Approach 1) by establishing the magnitude of the overdesign factor. [15 marks] Figure 2: Strip foundation with geometric dimensions and loading. Part (C) (20 marks) A flow net method is used to analyse the flow under the dam shown in Figure 3. Determine the respective water heads and the pore water pressures on each equipotential line. Figure 3: Clay dam with flow net and potential difference at two sides. Proposal Guidelines (Maximum one page) 1. Introduction – detail description of deliverables: The Introduction is the most important section of the proposal – it will either get your reader’s attention. To be effective, you want to outline the proposal and convince the reader. Include the following:- • State the problem/need that you are going to address. • Provide a short description of the task, including what you propose, who it will benefit. • Strong concluding statement. 2. General overview of proposed plan – initial understanding of solution to task 2. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 4 of 14 Include the following sections (each of these sections should have a separate section heading and may have more than one paragraph). Objectives – State your objectives as measurable outcomes of the solution. Be specific – make sure your solution is achievable within a specific time frame and measurable. Methodology – Describe the specific action items (actions that need to be taken in order to meet the objectives). Answer the following questions: How, When, and Why. 3. Timeline for completion of the given task. Prepare Gantt chart with activities and duration. Include a reasonable, sensible estimate of the time needed to complete all activities required in task 2. Report Format: 1) Introduction (200 words): In the introduction part of your report, you are attempting to inform the reader about the rationale behind your work. In other words, you are justifying why your work is an essential component of the module you are taking – Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016). The introduction is written with the view of introducing the topic of your CW and setting it into a broad context, gradually narrowing down to your learning outcomes. You may also state what type of approach you will be using in your CW for the entire discussion of your topic. Suffice to write a maximum of one page introduction (half page is OK). 2) Conclusion (100 words): In academic writing, a well-crafted conclusion can provide the final word on the value of your analysis, research, or paper. Complete your conclusions with conviction! Consider the conclusion from the reader’s perspective. At the end of a paper, a reader wants to know how to benefit from the work you accomplished in your paper. Include the following in your conclusion. ❖ How do the ideas in your report connect to what we have discussed in class, or to what scholars have written in their treatment of your topic? ❖ What new ideas have you added to the conversation? What ideas do you critique? ❖ What are the limitations of your data, methods, or results? ❖ What are the consequences of the strongest idea that comes out of your report? 3) References: Provide minimum 5 references. Make citations inside the report. Choose CU Harvard reference style for references and citations. Rules & Regulations: • All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 5 of 14 • The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using CU Harvard Style and page numbers. • Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of the faculty. • Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle. Guidelines: • Assignment must be computer typed. ➢ Font – Times New Roman ➢ Font – Style – Regular ➢ Font – Size – 12 ➢ Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline. • Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable software or by pencil. • Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings from group work. • You can refer books in E-Library or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources. Assessment Evaluation Criteria 1%-49% 50%-69% 70%- 76% 77%-83% 84%-90% 91%-100% No Task Fail Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Outstanding 1 Introduction The information appears to be disorganized. Efforts have been made to give objectives and structure of the report. Information is organized, but paragraphs are not wellconstructed. General introducti on with some related details are provided. Objectives and structure of the report evidently mentione d. Information is very clear, organized with wellconstructed paragraphs. Objectives of assignment and structure of report are clearly provided. Introduction is excellently written, formulaic, very well organized with key scientific concepts, wellconstructive paragraphs. Introduction is engaging; clearly state the main idea covering major concepts with supporting details, wellconstructive paragraphs with outset introduction. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 6 of 14 2 Critical Analysis/Results (Task 2) The analysis is incomplete or poorly implemented. The findings are not supported by the analysis. Misanalyzes data or fails to analyze relevant data. Results do not follow from the analysis and mistakes are made in interpretation on the analysis/results The analysis has a weak connection back to theory. A more thorough analysis should be considered. Validity of the findings is addressed but may lack a thorough approach. Analyses are executed satisfactorily, and additional analyses may have yielded further insights on the analysis/results Analysis is acceptable and fairly connected to the research question and theoretical framewor k. Validity of the findings are addressed on the analysis/re sults. Analysis is very good and connected to the research question and theoretical framework. Validity of the findings are addressed Well executed. Shows good understanding of the analytical methods. Provides good arguments for or against the hypotheses on the analysis/results Strong analytical skills and reflective, demonstrating personal learning on the analysis/result s of prestressed concrete. Validity of the findings are addressed perfectly. Excellently executed. Provides excellent arguments for or against the hypotheses on the analysis/result s Analysis is rigorous, nuanced, and transparent. Findings are connected to research question and theoretical foundations. in the field. Meaningful results obtained from sophisticated data analyses. • Analyses map back to the hypotheses on the analysis/results 3 Conclusion Conclusion does not reflect on findings of the study and information related to findings is not up to the requirements. Conclusion not clearly reflects on findings of the study and involves some information related to findings. Conclusio n clearly reflects on main findings of the study and involves required informatio n related to issues or findings and significant points of the report. Conclusion clearly reflects on main findings of the study and involves arguments that reflect the most appropriate issues or findings and covers the major significance points of the report. Conclusion very clearly reflects on main findings of the study and involves critical thinking; reflect the most appropriate issues or findings and significant points of the report. Extensive discussion is reflected on the results in the context of the objectives mentioned in the “Introduction”. In detailed representation of ideas in the report connecting to concepts/ideas 4 References Unacceptable referencing with incorrect use of the CU Harvard style. Evidence of little or No literature review and scholarly works. Adequate referencing style but may contain more inaccuracies with use of the CU Harvard style. Evidence of weak or poor literature review and scholarly works. Acceptabl e referencin g style but may contain some inaccuraci es with use of the CU Harvard style. Evidence of minimal or limited literature review and scholarly works. Generally well referenced with correct use of the CU Harvard referencing style. Evidence of very good literature review and scholarly works. Appropriate referencing and bibliography correctly using CU Harvard referencing style. Evidence of wide range of literature review and scholarly works. Accurate referencing and bibliography correctly using CU Harvard referencing style. Evidence of extensive literature review and scholarly works. Important Policies to be followed 1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*: Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 7 of 14 • MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled. • MEC also reserves the right to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of any unlawful activity and to cooperate thereafter in any investigation of such activity. • Faculty can conduct a viva to investigate and ascertain that the work submitted is student’s own work as per the guidelines for the same. A student can be given a maximum of 2 chances to attend the viva in such cases. It is expected that the student attends the viva during the first chance itself unless due to extenuating circumstances. If the student does not attend the viva in spite of being given 2 chances and fails to submit valid reasons, he/she will be awarded a fail in the module and this shall be counted as a case of academic integrity violation. All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below mentioned categories: 1. Plagiarism 2. Malpractice 3. Ghost Writing 4. Collusion 5. Other cases If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offence of academic integrity violation of plagiarism type 1.1. First Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: 1.1.1. Plagiarism a. If a student is caught first time in an act of academic integrity violation during his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student will be allowed to re-submit the assignment once as per the period allowed for re submission However, a penalty of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed. b. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work within one week (5 working days) from the date he or she is advised to re-submit. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 8 of 14 c. Re-submission of the work beyond the allowed period of resubmission will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark. d. If the re-submitted work (within the allowed period of resubmission) is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment component will be awarded a zero mark. It shall also contribute to the total count of academic integrity violation for that student. e. If plagiarism is detected in UG Project work (Project 1, Project Planning and Project Design and Implementation), the above clauses do not apply, and the work will be summarily rejected. In these cases the student will be awarded a fail (F) grade and is required to reregister the module. 1.1.2. Malpractice / Ghostwriting / Collusion If a student is caught first time in an act academic integrity violation during his/her course of study for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the module. 1.2. Second Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: 1.2.1. Plagiarism a. If any student is caught second time in an act of academic integrity violation during his/her course of study and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work, and s/he will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism is detected. b. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases. 1.2.2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion a. If a student is caught a second time in an act academic integrity violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the module. b. The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases. 1.3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: a. If a student is caught a third time in an act of academic integrity violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester then the student shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, once the academic integrity violation case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment Review Committee. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 9 of 14 b. The student shall be suspended for the immediate subsequent semester and can register for modules only after having served the suspension period fully. This is also applicable for semesters offered in block mode. c. During the suspension period, the student shall have to mandatorily complete a course on academic integrity/writing before s/he can register for any modules. d. During the period of suspension, the student shall be allowed to attempt supplementary examinations if s/he is eligible for the same. S/he shall also be allowed access to all college facilities permitted for a regular student except for registering the modules. 1.4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: a. If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of academic integrity violation for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, once the case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment Review Committee. b. The student shall be expelled from the college and all access to the college facilities and premises shall cease to exist. The documents shall be released only after getting the NOC (No Objection Certificate) from Registration Office. c. `On termination, the student shall not be refunded any fees paid for the academic semester in which academic integrity violation was observed. 1.5. Other cases If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an Institutional Assessment Review Committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a hearing of the parties concerned if required and shall take appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. 1.6. Types/Variations of cases of Plagiarism and associated actions Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students. If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of violations. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 10 of 14 Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all the students of the group. If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of violation. Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the following will be applicable: a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted. If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and the penalty will be applied for each student according to his / her history of violation. b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment component will be resubmitted – if the student is eligible for resubmission-. The policy will then be applied to that student alone. c. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment). 1.7. Types/Variation of Cases of Multiple Offences If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in different modules of the same semester, they will be considered as one offence and student will be penalized for each violation according to the type of the offence. If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in the same module of the same semester, then they will be considered as different offences and each will contribute to the overall count of AIV. The student then shall be penalized for each violation according to the count and type of each offence. * For further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 11 of 14 2. Late Submission Regulations: It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of submission. Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the following shall apply. • Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions. • Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. • Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee. • Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the commencement of research. • Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only for the intended purpose of research. Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 12 of 14 Proposal Evaluation Grid No. Description Fail (0-49)% Satisfact ory (50-69)% Good (70- 76)% Very goo d (77- 83) % Excellent (84-90)% Outstandi ng (≥ 91%) Mark allotted Marks Obtained 1. Executive Summary 35 2. General overview of proposed plan – initial understanding of solution to task2 40 3. Time plan 25 Total Marks Obtained /100 Penalty Marks after Penalty Final Marks Scaled-down to 10 Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 13 of 14 Evaluation Criteria Task Weak /Poor (< 50) Satisfac tory (50-69) Good (70-76) Very Good Quality (77-83) Excellent (84-90) Out standing (91-100) Marks scored Max. Marks Full report structure – title page, font size and type etc. 5 Introduction 10 Desgin, Analysis and results Ta sk 2 Part (A) *Make all calculations with result interpretation 25 Part (B) *Make all calculations with result interpretation 25 Part (C) *Make all calculations with result interpretation 20 Conclusions 10 References & citation – put min 5 references 5 Total Marks 100 Penalty (if any) Marks scaled to 50 Final Marks Geotechnology 2 (CIVL 0016) – Fall 2020 – Assignment 1 – Session A – QP MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02 Page 14 of 14

Get professional assignment help cheaply

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.

Why choose our academic writing service?

Plagiarism free papers
Timely delivery
Any deadline
Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
Subject-relevant academic writer
Adherence to paper instructions
Ability to tackle bulk assignments
Reasonable prices
24/7 Customer Support
Get superb grades consistently

Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor’s, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?

Plagiarism free papers
Timely delivery
Any deadline
Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
Subject-relevant academic writer
Adherence to paper instructions
Ability to tackle bulk assignments
Reasonable prices
24/7 Customer Support
Get superb grades consistently

How It Works
1.      Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2.      Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3.      Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4.      Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.

 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ASSIGNMENT WORKER TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

The post fundamentals and applications of microfluidics appeared first on Essay fount.


What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."


"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"