The review must be formatted according to MLA guidelines.
You must use specific quotes and paraphrases from the source to support your points.
All
borrowed material needs to be properly cited and fully documented in
MLA format (both within the text and on an accurate works cited page).
The
purpose of this assignment is not to fully explore your research topic.
Instead, you will be focusing on a critical, thoughtful review of the
source. Consider the way the author of the source presents the
information and evaluate the source for credibility, usefulness,
relevance, ethos, pathos, logos, etc.
Your thesis statement should
reflect whether or not the source is effective based on an evaluation of
the criteria listed above. For example, is the source effective because
it provides much logical appeal (logos) in the form of facts and
statistics? Or does the strength come from the authors credentials and
background or extensive experience with the topic?
In addition to a
strong thesis statement, your review should include an engaging
introduction, several well-developed body paragraphs that support the
thesis, and a powerful conclusion that reiterates your main ideas.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
it’s gotta be in MLA format and To complete your review, aim to write a strong, well-planned essay that reviews the source on the following range of criteria:
credibility*
ethos (often linked to credibility)
pathos
logos
usefulness
purpose
relevance to your research project
*You must include at least one paragraph that critically evaluates the source’s author on the basis of his or her credibility.