Strengthen reflection and analysis skills for understanding dynamics of dialogic processes and how deign
choices and strategies affect them.
2. Synthesize and critically examine theoretical and applied theories of change and theories of practice
studied in this course to assess the ways they apply to lived experience.
3. Identify alternate strategies and methods that would
CONTENT
** Please note that I am committed to keeping the content of these papers confidential in case you address
sensitive situations or issues. Additionally, feel free anonymize the people or content as needed. **
Select a specific experience of a group process aimed at addressing conflict and / or addressing a difficult issue in
some way. It can be a one-off meeting or a longer process with different iterations. In a paragraph or two,
provide a brief overview of the context for the process. You should have firsthand experience of the process in
any role and should adopt a stance of analytic empathy to consider issues from the likely perspective of different
stakeholders involved.
you are encouraged to then assess the process design and the outcomes focusing on the dynamics most
relevant to the context. Please consider the following questions (not necessarily in this order), answering to the
best of your knowledge / from your perspective.
What was the purpose of the process? Was it clear to all involved? Any issues arising about the
purpose?
How was it framed? Was the framing conducive to the purpose? Were there any controversies over the
framing or alternatives that might have opened the space for engagement more inclusively and / or
powerfully.
Consultation and assessment phase. From your knowledge, how were stakeholders consulted? Was it
the right mix of people to reflect the diversity of
How was the process convened under what auspices and around what context? Where there any
issues or dynamics around the legitimacy of the convenors? How did this help to or fail to address
concerns of stakeholders?
How was participation in the process managed? What kinds of stakeholders participated and how? In
more phased processes, did people participate differently at different points in the process? Was there
any preparatory process for different stakeholder groups?
How would you describe the design of the process overall and / or of the specific meeting? Thinking of
some of the process methodologies weve studied, how would you identify the process design enacted
in this experience? Was it appropriate for the context and the purpose?
Was there a facilitator (or team?) if so, how did their role influence the ways the process unfolded?
In your view, what were the implicit theories of change and theories of practice that were enacted by
the convenors (and facilitators, if relevant)?
Conclude with your thoughts on what you consider to be the key decisions and strategies evident in this process.
Identify whether you believe that, on balance, these moves were wise and / or what might have been done
differently to lead to outcomes that supported more restorative and transformative change.
SOURCES:
This is the assignment where you are asked to demonstrate that you have been engaging with the readings and
the concepts explored in this class and you are asked to interrogate them in relation to the practice you are
analyzing. Through your analysis, you should be able to demonstrate that you have understood concepts and
that you can apply them. Please reference and cite these sources accordingly. I would expect you to engage with
and reference ideas from at least 5 different sources from materials assigned for our class, in addition to any
other sources you find relevant. You may also have other sources specific to the process itself or to other
relevant literature.
In referencing your sources, you must use a recognized reference style of your choosing (e.g., APA, Chicago,
MLA) and use it consistently throughout to fully cite your sources. Please consult: The Everyday Writer, 7th
edition, Lunsford, Andrea A. (EMUs edition of this writing handbook.)
FORMAT AND PRESENTATION
You are encouraged to write from the perspective of your personal voice, enabling you to both make
transparent your awareness of your own positionality in relation to this issue and to integrate experiences as
relevant. At the same time, you must draw upon strategic use of class sources to develop, support and explain
your arguments. Use first-person (e.g. I believe. ) and strong outside perspectives to weave your voice into an
ongoing conversation in the field with references to the works of others. If available and appropriate, you can
attach or incorporate supporting materials, such as photos, agendas, publicity, invitations, and other resources
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
