demonstrate your moral reasoning surrounding a case

,

Was Mike Daisey justified in lying about his experiences in China? In your answer, please draw on course readings, lectures and discussions to a) summarize the case so that someone not familiar could understand the key aspects of the ethical dilemma, b) identify arguments in support of the actions taken by Daisey; c) identify arguments in opposition to the actions taken by Daisey; and d) specify your own position.


You should respond in essay form and be 1,000 words in length (~4-pages, double-spaced with Times New Roman font).

Essay Rubric
Essay Rubric
Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Is between 750 and 1100 words

2 pts

Full Marks
Yes

0 pts

No Marks
Is outside the word limit
2 pts
Grammar

5 pts

Full Marks
No serious issues with grammar or spelling.

0 pts

Serious issues with grammar and/or spelling
Work demonstrates lack of care with grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling, in ways that could have been fixed with a cursory proofread or attention to spell check.
5 pts
Summary

Includes a summary of the Mike Daisey case and its ethical dilemma using terms from class, such that someone unfamiliar with the situation or ethical terminology could make sense of it.

10 pts

Excellent
Summary of the case is clear, well-stated, thorough, and includes concepts from class that illuminate the ethical dilemma at the heart of the case.

8 pts

Good
Summary of the Mike Daisey case is good, but may be missing a key element, or the description of the ethical dilemma is not fully explained. Terms from class may be lacking.

5 pts

Not fully developed
Maybe missing one or the other of the summary and the exposition of the ethical dilemma. Both may be present but in incomplete terms. May feel rushed.

0 pts

Summary is missing
No summary of the case is apparent.
10 pts
Identifies arguments in support of Daisey

Includes arguments that might support Daisey’s actions in terms from class.

10 pts

Thorough and thoughtful
Includes several arguments that could support Daisey’s action, specifically citing ethical thinkers and their theories and clearly relating them to the Daisey case.

8 pts

Acceptable
Includes a thoughtful argument in support of Daisey. May be just one argument. Refers to class terms and thinkers.

5 pts

Partial credit
An argument in support of Daisey’s actions is present, but may not refer to specific thinkers or use class terms appropriately. May demonstrate some lack of understanding of class concepts.

0 pts

Incomplete
No arguments in support of Daisey’s actions are present.
10 pts
Identifies arguments against Daisey’s action

Identifies arguments against what Daisey did, using class terms and ideas.

10 pts

Excellent
Includes several possible arguments against what Daisey did, specifically referring to ethical theories and thinkers from class, and using terms clearly and appropriately. Shows commitment to quality work.

8 pts

Good
Includes at least one strong and well developed possible argument against Daisey’s actions. Refers to class terms and thinkers.

5 pts

Partial credit
An argument against Daisey’s actions, based on class readings and concepts, is present, but may not refer to specific thinkers or use class terms appropriately. May demonstrate some lack of understanding of class concepts.

0 pts

Incomplete
No possible argument against what Daisey did is present.
10 pts
Includes a personal position

Takes a personal position on Daisey’s actions and presents reasons that draw on class concepts.

10 pts

Excellent
Takes a position on the case, using class concepts, and explaining why the position taken is better than the alternatives. Makes correct use of class concepts and terms. Is convincing and well reasoned.

8 pts

Good
A personal position is taken, and uses class concepts and thinkers correctly. May not explain why this position is better than the alternatives. May overlook important possible objections or miss relevant concepts.

5 pts

Partial credit
A personal position is taken, but may not draw on class concepts or thinkers. May not tie the personal position to readings or lectures. May not make a good case or present a clear argument.

0 pts

Incomplete
No personal position is taken.
10 pts
Formatting

Is broken into paragraphs. Has a heading and includes the writer’s name. Includes a word count.

3 pts

Full Marks
Has a heading, and includes the writers name, AND includes a word count AND is broken into paragraphs.

2 pts

Missing an element
Is missing one or two of those elements.

1 pts

Fair
Only has one of those elements

0 pts

Poorly formatted
Lacks all of those elements.
3 pts
Total Points: 50


What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."


"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"


Related posts:

  1. Pick one idea found in the European and modern thinkers we have studied, explain the idea using examples and apply it to an ethical problem we face in the world today to show that the idea is or is not useful for helping with the problem.
  2. any
  3. create a legislative bill
  4. The Ethics of Abortion
/by