Order Description
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH FOR PRACTICE & POPULATIONS
Competency 7000.1.1: Evaluating Comprehensive Literature Reviews The graduate evaluates comprehensive literature reviews for historical context completeness applicability reliability organization and quality of information sources.
Competency 7000.1.7: Translation of Research in Evidence-Based Practice The graduate interprets evidence and evaluates its applicability to nursing practice.
Introduction:
One of the key roles of the masters-prepared nurse is to lead practice change across the full spectrum of healthcare settings. Masters-prepared nurses must be able to translate the existing body of knowledge around a phenomenon of interest (accessible through published research studies) to inform decision making related to nursing practice.
Requirements:
A. Identify a current nursing practice within your healthcare setting that requires change.
Note: This may be your current work setting or a setting you wish to work in.
1. Describe the current nursing practice.
2. Discuss why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
B. Identify the key stakeholders within your healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.
1. Describe the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
C. Evaluate five sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals published within the past five years that relate to the change identified in part A.
1. Create an evidence critique table (see Sample Evidence Critique Table) by identifying the evidence strength and evidence hierarchy of each chosen source.
D. Develop an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of five sources used (suggested length of 12 pages for all sources).
E. Recommend a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
F. Identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.
1. Justify why you chose the practice change model.
2. Explain how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
G. Discuss possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
H. Discuss any possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.
Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assesment.
Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.
File Attachments:
1. Sample Evidence Critique Table link opens in new window
Click to Show/Hide Method
Evaluation Method
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity organization mechanics)
The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.
The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
The candidate provides limited articulation of response.
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A. Nursing Practice Identification
The candidate does not identify a current nursing practice within the candidates healthcare setting that requires change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a current nursing practice within the candidates healthcare setting that requires change.
A1. Nursing Practice Description
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with no detail of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with limited detail of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with adequate detail of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with substantial detail of the current nursing practice.
A2. Why Nursing Practice Needs to Change
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with no support of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with limited support of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with adequate support of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with substantial support of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
B. Key Stakeholders
The candidate does not identify the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.
B1. Stakeholders Roles
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with no detail of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with limited detail of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with adequate detail of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description with substantial detail of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
C. Evidence Critique Table
The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals published within the past five years that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation of 14 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals published within the past five years that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation with limited detail of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals published within the past five years that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation with adequate detail of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals published within the past five years that relate to the change identified in part A
The candidate provide a logical evaluation with substantial detail of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals published within the past five years that relate to the change identified in part A.
D. Evidence Summary
The candidate does not provide an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C with no detail that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C with limited detail that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C with adequate detail that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C with substantial detail that includes each of the 5 sources used.
E. Recommend Best Practice
The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation for a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation with no detail of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation with limited detail of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation with adequate detail of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation with substantial detail of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
F. Practice Change Model
The candidate does not identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.
F1. Model Justification
The candidate does not provide a logical justification of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification with no support of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification with limited support of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification with adequate support of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification with substantial support of why the practice change model was chosen.
F2. Model to Guide Implementation
The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation with no detail of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation with limited detail of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation with adequate detail of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation with substantial detail of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
G. Barriers to Implementation
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with no detail of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with limited detail of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with adequate detail of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with substantial detail of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
H. Ethical Implications
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with no support of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with limited support of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with adequate support of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion with substantial support of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
