Description:
For this forum, choose one of the following topics to respond to for your initial post. When you respond to your peers please respond, if possible, to a learner who has posted a contrary view on the topic you selected and then, at a minimum respond to at least one learner who has posted on the topic you did not select.
Topic A: Rawlsian Justice
John Rawls claims that justice comes down to a notion of fairness. He proposed a thought experiment wherein he proffers an ideal "original position." The idea is that representatives of the people operate behind a "veil of ignorance" when determining what policies are in the best interests of all of the citizens. In brief, representatives are ignorant of their "The race, ethnicity, gender, age, income, wealth, natural endowments, comprehensive doctrine, etc. of any of the citizens in society, or to which generation in the history of the society these citizens belong" and "The political system of the society, its class structure, economic system, or level of economic development" (Wenar 4.6). They do understand different people have different life plans, that even if resources are scarce, "there is enough to go around," and have good common sense.
Discussion task: Imagine you are a representative behind this veil. Discuss and defend several measures you would take to ensure a fair and equitable redistribution of resources.
Wenar, Leif, "John Rawls", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Edited by Edward N. Zalta 9 January 2017.
Topic B: Ayn Rand’s Rational Egoism
Do some research into Rand’s rational egoism and then either defend her theory as a reasonable way to make moral judgments or argue that her way of thinking about morality is untenable. Pick a situation like charity, community service or government assistance (Welfare) and, after providing what you feel would be her attituded toward the action, discuss if you feel she is morally right.
Discussion Guidelines:
- A minimum of three posts.
- Posts should be substantive
- Initial post 300 word count minimum with two (2) sources cited minimum, validating your position
- Peer responses 100 word count minimum with one (1) source cited, validating your position
- Use the Philosophical Inquiry Method – Who, What, When, Where, How, and Why?
- The initial forum response is due by Thursday at 11:55 p.m. EST and should be a substantive response to the discussion prompt.
- For peer replies, respond to at least two of your classmates by Sunday at 11:55 p.m. EST and give meaningful replies that advance the discussion.
- Any Style Format is acceptable
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
