Two part paper
Part One: Due Jan 29
Ethical Dilemma Paper: Initial Reaction Assignment Instructions
Overview
You will write an analysis integrating various sources of knowledge – the textbook, the Bible, and the NASW Code of Ethics. This paper will be broken into two parts.
The first part of this paper is addressing your initial gut reaction. You will start by describing the ethical dilemma that you chose from the approved list. Then you will describe your “gut” reaction to this problem.
Ethical Dilemma #17
Peggy is a social worker at Pawtucket General Hospital. She is assigned to the neonatal
unit. In the unit is a three-day-old infant, Baby R., who was born severely impaired. Baby R. is
missing most of his brain, is blind, unable to hear, and has severe heart damage.
Baby R.’s parents, who have no health care coverage, are overwhelmed with grief about
their baby’s medical condition. The hospital’s doctors explain to the parents that their child will
never lead a normal life and probably will die within a year, even with aggressive medical care. The doctors also explain that the baby will have to undergo several complicated operations on
his heart to save his life.
The doctors tell the parents that, in their judgement, it would be a mistake to take
extraordinary measures to save the baby’s life. They explain that the procedures are complex and
remarkably expensive. The doctors are also unsure whether their efforts will improve the quality
of or prolong the baby’s life.
Peggy meets with Baby R.’s parents to discuss their reactions to the options described by
the doctors. Baby R.’s parents say they want to insist that the hospital staff do everything
possible to save and improve their child’s life. They explain that they feel “bonded” with the
baby and believe he has a right to as much health care as any other baby.
Instructions
- This paper should be 3-4 pages long.
- An abstract is not necessary; however, a correctly formatted title and reference page are required. The title and reference page are not included in the page length.
- This paper should be written in current APA format.
- The proper use of headings will help organize your paper.
The paper must align with the following guidelines:
Describe the ethical dilemma.
Define the actual dilemma – This is the decision that you must make.
Whom does the dilemma impact (or whom could it potentially impact) and how? This is the ripple effect of the dilemma. Think deeply and broadly, and demonstrate that you understand the impact of the dilemma.
Describe the competing values present in the dilemma from the list of 6 social work values in the NASW Code of Ethics. How are the values relevant in this the dilemma, and how do they compete with each other?
Describe your first “gut” solution to the problem.
This section should demonstrate not only an understanding of the NASW Code of Ethics, but also self-awareness and an understanding of how your own experiences have shaped how you make decisions. Simply stating the decision that you would make will not suffice. This section is where you will discuss not only what you would do, but why.
Part Two: Due Feb 19
ETHICAL DILEMMA PAPER: MORAL FRAMEWORK ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW
For this part, you will use the morality framework (from the course text) to evaluate your initial
“gut reaction” solution to the ethical dilemma. Considering what you wrote as your initial “gut”
solution, you will apply that solution/decision to the framework presented in the textbook. After
working through each step of the framework, you will re-evaluate your initial “gut” solution, and
develop at least two alternative solutions (at least one must be biblically principled).
Additionally, you will address the role that supervision and consultation would have within this
dilemma.
INSTRUCTIONS
· This paper must be at least 4 pages long.
o The title and reference page are not included in this page count.
o Include part one of the paper in this submission (Part one will not be graded for
this part; it is included only for reference).
· This paper should be written in current APA formatting.
The paper must align with the following guidelines:
● Use the morality framework (Step 1, #1–10 and Step 2) on pages 41–46 to analyze the
ethical dilemma. Please number the steps in your paper and use level two headings to
organize your paper. Do not write this portion in paragraph form.
o If any of the steps are not applicable to your situation, please note this in your
paper. Simply leaving the steps out, or marking them N/A will result in a loss of
points. You need to explain why the step is not applicable, in order to demonstrate
your understanding of each particular step. Thoughtful analysis for each step
should be applied here.
● Re-evaluate your initial “gut” solution.
o Now that you have worked through your initial solution utilizing the framework,
analyze your solution. This section should demonstrate an ability to see all sides
of a dilemma, and make decisions that reflect social work values and a focus on
the client. Simply stating, "I still agree with my initial reaction," will not suffice
here.
● Describe at least two alternative solutions and provide a rationale for each. At least 1 of
the solutions must reflect a biblical worldview, and you must support this solution with
scripture and biblical principles. This area should reflect your ability to conceptualize
alternative actions, and how those actions will impact your client.
● Discuss how you could use supervision and consultation as a resource when evaluating
the potential solutions.
o What would be the benefit in talking with your supervisor about this dilemma?
How would you approach your supervisor about this situation?
o Are there others who would be appropriate to consult about this particular
situation? If so, who and how do you think they could be of assistance to you?
o What additional resources could you examine (e.g. agency policy, State or federal
laws, etc.) to assist you in evaluating the potential solutions?
The paper is to be written in APA format. The paper will be graded per the rubric, which reflects
a 70/30 break-down (70% of the grade is weighted for content, 30% is weighted for
mechanics/grammar/formatting). There is no need to include an abstract in the paper. This paper
assesses Competency 1- Ethical and Professional Behavior (knowledge, values, cognitive &
affective processes).
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
