Rubric

Portfolio Project: Leadership Interview
Portfolio Project: Leadership Interview
Criteria Ratings Pts
Description of Nurse Leader

The student included the description of the nurse leader he/she interviewed. The student explained who the person is, his/her role, etc. The student described the characteristics displayed by this person, how his /her leadership improves patient outcomes.

10 to >7.0 pts

Proficient
The student included the description of the nurse leader he/she interviewed. The student explained who the person is, his/her role, etc. The student described the characteristics displayed by this person, how his/her leadership improves patient outcomes, and the leadership characteristics and theory (theories) that are exemplified in this person’s leadership.

7 to >6.0 pts

Acceptable
The student included a description of the nurse leader. The student explained who the person is, his/her role, etc. The student described to a limited degree a few characteristics displayed by this person, how his /her leadership improves patient outcomes to a limited degree, and a leadership characteristic and/or theory that are exemplified in this person’s leadership.

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
The student did not include the description of the nurse leader he/she interviewed and/or the description was shallow, vague, or incomplete.
10 pts
Priority Quality Improvement Issues

The student identified and briefly described 3-4 priority quality improvement issues that were mentioned by the nurse leader in the interview; the student clearly explained their significance and implications in relation to the organization.

25 to >19.0 pts

Proficient
The student identified and briefly described 3-4 priority quality improvement issues that were mentioned by the nurse leader in the interview; the student clearly explained their significance and implications in relation to the organization.

19 to >17.0 pts

Acceptable
The student identified and briefly described some priority quality improvement issues that were mentioned by the nurse leader in the interview; the student explained their significance and implications in relation to the organization to a limited degree.

17 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
The student did not identify and briefly describe 3-4 priority quality improvement issues that were mentioned by the nurse leader in the interview, and/or the student did not clearly explain their significance or implications in relation to the organization.
25 pts
One Priority Quality Improvement Issue

The student selected one priority quality improvement issue gleaned from the nurse leader which the student will address in his/her quality improvement project; the quality issue represents an important issue for improvement in the organization; the student justified selection of the issue.

50 to >39.0 pts

Proficient
The student selected one priority quality improvement issue gleaned from the nurse leader, which the student will address in his/her quality improvement project; the quality issue represents an important issue for improvement in the organization; the student justified selection of the issue.

39 to >34.0 pts

Acceptable
The student selected one priority quality improvement issue gleaned from the nurse leader, which the student will address in his/her quality improvement project; the quality issue represents a somewhat important issue for improvement in the organization; the student partially justified selection of the issue.

34 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
The student did not select a priority quality improvement issue gleaned from the nurse leader, which the student will address in his/her quality improvement project and/or issue selected does not represent an important issue for improvement in the organization; the student did not justify selection of the issue or the justification was not sufficient the student did not give a convincing explanation for choosing the issue.
50 pts
AIM

The student addressed the AIM of the project that is specific, measureable, and addresses why, when, and how the project would improve patient outcomes.

15 to >11.0 pts

Proficient
The student addressed the AIM of the project that is specific, measurable, and addresses why, when, and how the project would improve patient outcomes.

11 to >10.0 pts

Acceptable
The student addressed parts of the AIM of the project or all of it but to a limited degree (that is specific, measurable, and addresses why, when, and how the project would improve patient outcomes).

10 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
The student didn’t address the AIM of the project or did so in a way that isn’t specific, measurable, and/or doesn’t address why, when, and how the project would improve patient outcomes.
15 pts
Total Points: 100

What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."


“Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!”