Go to the section of the New York Timesand look for a debate that concerns a policy issue that we have covered in Modules 1-3. You can look elsewhere at other newspapers you are not able to find the appropriate article.
Then, do the following:
-
Summarize the gist of the debate by identifying the issue, and summarizing what each of the discussants has to say. Be sure to identify the debaters/discussants when you present their argument.
-
Your initial post must also clearly identify the issue in question in your textbook (chapter, page), and should then discuss how the debate relates to the discussion in your textbook.
-
Does the debate agree or disagree in part or wholly with your book?
-
Does it extend and add to what is covered in the book in any way?
-
Be sure that you follow these guidelines:
- The initial post for this prompt MUST be at least 400 words.
- Be sure to provide in-text citations for the material you cite. Provide the complete citation at the bottom of the post.
- Reply to two of your classmates on different days of the week. When you do so, you must look up additional information on the policy issue that they identify. This information should come from either a policy website, a government website, a peer reviewed journal, or a textbook that specifically focuses on social welfare policies.
- Each reply for this prompt MUST be at least 250 words.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
