IHP 430 Module Three Group Discussion Guidelines and Rubric
Multi-voting Process Tool
1. Review the following scenario. Choose a multi-voting process tool you will use to complete the analysis of the scenario. Then, work through the scenario
to determine which project you willselect.
2. Next, discuss the process and the tool you used to complete the multi-voting process analysis with your group on the discussion topic.
3. Finally, discuss the four criteria that should be considered when problem-solving: risk, economy,timing, andresources.
Using a multi-voting process tool, address the following problem:
Ten projects are being considered by the QM team. Based on team member preferences (below), if a single vote is held, Project D will be selected. The chair
wants to consider team member preferences beyond simply their first choices. Use a multi-voting process and assign three points to each member’s first choice,
two points to the second, and one point to the third. After the first vote, options that receive fewer than three points should be eliminated and the remaining
options re-voted. In subsequent rounds, two points will be given to the first choice and one point to the second. Continue to eliminate low vote-tallying options
until all but two options have been eliminated. On the final vote, each team member will get a single vote worth one point. Which option will be selected?
Jacob D, I, B, C, A, F, E, J, H, G
Isabella A, C, E, F, G, J, D, H, I, B
Ethan H, G, E, D, B, I, J, A, C, F
Emma D, I, F, A, E, G, B, C, H, J
Olivia B, G, A, J, H, C, F, E, I, D
Multi-voting Process Tool Peer Feedback: As healthcare managers, there are two important skills to master: working in groups or teams, and giving and receiving
constructive feedback. For this project, each team is composed of three to five team members. Individually, complete your multi-voting process analysis to select
the best approach in identifying problems and post it to your group’s discussion topic to share with your team members during Module Three. During Module
Three, you will go to the group discussion to review your team members’ multi-voting analysis responses. When reviewing your peers work, offer constructive
feedback (to at least two peers).
You are expected to provide feedback on the content of the multi-voting analysis and compare and contrast each peer approach with your own. The
communication tone of the critique must be professional and respectful, and contain a rationale that supports your critique. Make content recommendations
that are focused and relevant to the multi-voting process analysis, and use proper mechanics of writing. This must be completed before the end of Module Three.
Your final product will be graded individually.
Rubric
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Discussion of Process
and Tools Used in
Analysis
Meets or exceeds “Proficient”
criteria and demonstrates indepth knowledge of the process
and the tools used to complete
the multi-voting process
analysis
Effectively discussestheprocess
and the tools used to complete
the multi-voting process
analysis
Effectively discusses the multivoting analysis tool, but does not
evaluate the process
Does not discuss the tool or
process used to complete the
multi-voting process analysis
20
Discussion of the
Four Criteria
Meets or exceeds “Proficient”
criteria and demonstrates indepth knowledge of the four
criteria: risk, economy, timing,
and resources
Effectively discusses the four
criteria: risk, economy, timing,
and resources
Discusses at least two of the four
criteria: risk, economy, timing, and
resources
Does not discuss any of the four
criteria: risk, economy, timing,
and resources
20
Analyses of Problem
Using the Multivoting Process Tool
Meets or exceeds “Proficient”
criteria and demonstrates
exceptional knowledge of the
multi-voting tool used in
problem analysis
Analyzes problem using the
multi-voting tool
Partially completes analysis using
the multi-voting tool
Does not complete analysis
using the multi-voting tool
20
Critique of Content Exceeds “Proficient” criteriaand
demonstrates in-depth
knowledge of content to
provide peer with anexemplary
critique
Critique is clear, with concrete
information that could be acted
on for improvement, as well as
positive acknowledgement
when indicated
Critique is constructive, but may
lack clarity or indicate non-specific
action
Critique is superfluous, vague,
non-specific, and unclear
20
Content
Recommendations
Exceeds “Proficient” criteria by
providing exemplary
recommendations that are
focused and relevant to the
multi-voting process analysis
Makes recommendations that
are focused and relevant to the
multi-voting process analysis
Makes recommendations that are
focused on the analysis conducted,
but do not include feedback that is
relevant
Does not make
recommendations
20
Earned Total 100%
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
