QSO 340 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview The final project for this course is the creation of a case study analysis. You will select one of two case studies to analyze, identify ing its positive and negative events and providing high -level recommendations to solve identified and potential issues. The final product represents an authentic demonstration of competency because the management of projects is essential to the success of business initiatives. It is likely you will be involved in a project as team members or stakeholder s at some point in your career; therefore , it is important that you understan d what project management is, how it works, and what language you should use to communicate project progress and plans. Having a basic unders tanding of the various methodologies will also make you flexible and capable of using the most appropriate techniques for different project situations. The project is divided into two milestones , which will be submitted at various points throughout the c ourse to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following cour se outcomes: Determine appropriate application of project management methodologies based on key project factors Analyze the management of real world projects and operations for identifying potential improvements Analyze projects in terms of how the knowl edge areas and process groups of project management are used Analyze communication and collaboration strategies for their use in managing projects with multiple stakeholders Prompt For the final project, you will select a case study to analyze, identify i ts positive and negativ e events, and provide high -level recommendations to solve identified and p otential issues . Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Introduction : Provide a summary of the case. Describe the situation, the stakeholders, the critical events, and the project of the case stu dy. II. Analysis : Analyze the case and include the following components. a. Identify the project management methodology used in the case and explain the characteristics of the project that indicat e the methodology. b. Identify areas of success in the management of the project. Be specific and reference the case study in support of your analysis. c. Identify issues or potential issues with how the project management is being conducted. Explain your reason ing using examples from the case study. d. Build a complete stakeholder register for the case study project using the provided template. Your register should identify all necessary stakeholders and highlight key stakeholders. e. Using your stakeholder register, calculate and diagram the communication channels the project manager will use for key stakehold ers and remaining stakeholders. f. Using examples from the case study, differentiate between key and remaining stakeholder channels and discuss the potential strugg les that might be faced by each. g. Select two collaboration and communication strategies you could use to address potential challenges communicating with various stakeholders based on your communication channels. Explain the reasoning for your selections. III. PMI (Project Management Institute®) a. Provide a brief description of how the project approaches each of the ten PMI knowledge areas . In other words, describe the knowledge areas in terms of how they are used in the project in the case study. b. Analyze the case study project and briefly discuss the project in terms of how the five process groups are applied. c. Identify where knowledge areas or process groups are approached unsuccessfully and explain your reasoning using examples from the case study. IV. Recommendation s a. Considering the methodology used in the case, recommend an alternative methodology that may have been more appropriate. Be sure to identify the specific elements of the case to support your recommendation. b. Identify potential improvements you would have made if you were project manager, based on your analysis of the case. Milestones Milestone One : Introduction, Methodology, Successes, Failures, and Process Groups In Module Three , you will create an introduction for your case study analysis, analyze specific elements of the case, and relate the case stud y to the PMBOK® Process Groups. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two : Stakeholder Analysis, PMBOK® Knowledge Areas, and Potential Improvements In Module Five , you will continue your case study analysis and address topics ranging from stakeholder analysis to PMBOK ® knowledge areas. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Final Submission : Final Project In Module Seven , you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout th e course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric. Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your case study analysis should be 5 –7 pages in length, not including the cover page and references page. It should be formatted with 12 -point Tim es New Roman font, double spacing, one -inch margins, and all citations and references should be formatted according to APA guidelines. Critical Elements Exemplary (100% ) Proficient (85% ) Needs Improvement (55% ) Not Evident (0% ) Value Introduction Meets “Proficient” criteria and expertly balances brevity with required detail Provides a summary of the case , including a description of the situation, stakeholders, critical events, and project of the case study Provides a summary of the case , including a description of the situation, stakeholders, critical events and project of the case study, but summary is verbose or contains inaccuracies Does not provide a summary of the case study 7.4 Analysis: Methodology Meets “Proficient” criteria , and explanation demonstrates exceptional insight into project management methodologies Identifies the project management methodology used in the case and explains the characteristics of the project that indicate the methodology Identifies the project management methodology used in the case and explains the characteristics of the project, but explanation is cursory or does not address the characteristics that indicate methodology Does not identify the project management methodology used in the case or explain the characteristics 7.4 Analysis: Areas of Success Meets “Proficient” criteria , and refer ences to case study demonstrate exceptional insight into project management as occurred in the case Iden tifies specific areas of success in the management of the project , referencing case study for support Identifies areas of success in the management of the project , using references to the case study, but explanation lacks specificity or case reference Does not identify areas of success in the management of the project 7.4 Analysis: Potential Issues Meets “Proficient” criteria , and examples demonstrate a complex grasp of the issues or potential issues with project management in the case study Identifi es issues or potential issues with how the project management is being conducted and explains reasoning using relevant examples from the case study Identifies issues or potential issues with how the project management is being conducted and explains reason ing using examples from the case study, but explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies , or does not use relevant examples from the case study Does not identify issues or potential issues with how the project management is being condu cted and does not explain reasoning 7.4 Analysis: Register Meets “Proficient” criteria , and stakeholder register is meticulously constructed Builds a complete stakeholder register for the case study project using the provided template, identifying all neces sary stakeholders and highlighting key stakeholders Builds a stakeholder regi ster for the case study project but does not use the provided template, or does not identify all necessary stakeholders or highlight key stakeholders Does not build a stakeholder regis ter for the case study project 7.4 Analysis: Communication Channels Meets “Proficient” criteria , and all communication channels are meticulously represented in the diagram and calculations Calculates and diagrams correctly the communication channels the project manager will use for key stakeholders and remaining stakeholders Calculates and diagrams the communication channels the project manager will use for all stakeholders, but diagram is incomplete or channels are inaccurate Does not c alculate or diagram the communication channels the project manager will use for stakeholders 7.4 Analysis: Potential Struggles Meets “Proficient” criteria , and examples show keen insight into potential challenges for communication of stakeholders Differentiates be tween key and remaining stakeholder channels and discusses the potential struggles that might be faced by each, using examples from the case study Differentiates between key and remaining stakeholder channels and discusses the potential struggles that mig ht be faced by each, but d iscussion contains inaccuracies or does not use examples from the case study Does not differentiate between key and re maining stakeholder channels or discuss the potential struggles that might be faced by each 7.4 Analysis: Collaboration and Communication Strategies Meets “Proficient” criteria , and explanation d emonstrates exceptional insight into collaboration and communication strategies Selects two collaboration and communication strategies that could be used to address potential challenges communicating with various stakeholders , explaining reasoning , and strategies are based on communication channels Selects two collaboration and communication strategies that could be used to address potential challenges communicating w ith various stakeholders , explaining reasoning, but strategies are not based on communication channels, or explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not select two collaboration and communication strategies that could be used to address potentia l challenges 7.4 PMI: Knowledge Areas Meets “Proficient” criteria , and description makes cogent connections between the project and the ten PMI knowledge areas Provides a brief description of how the project approaches each of the ten PMI knowledge areas Provides a description of how the project approaches the PMI knowledge areas, but description is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not provide a description of how the project approaches the PMI knowledge areas 7.4 PMI: Process Groups Meets “Profici ent” criteria , and discussion makes cogent connections between the project and the five process groups Analyzes the case study project and briefly discusses the project in terms of how the five process groups are applied Analyzes the case study project and briefly discusses the project in terms of how the five process groups are applied, but analysis or discussion is verbose, cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not an alyze the case study project or briefly discuss the project in terms of how the five proc ess groups are applied 7.4 PMI: Approached Unsuccessful ly Meets “Proficient” criteria , and examples make cogent connections between the project and the five process groups Identifies where knowledge areas or process groups are approached unsuccessfully and explains the reasoning using relevant examples from the case study Identifies where knowledge areas or process groups are approached unsuccessfully and explains the reasoning, but explanation is cursory, contains inaccuracies , or does not use relevant examples from the case study Does not identify where knowledge areas or process groups are approached unsuccessfully, or does not explain the reasoning 7.4 Recommendations: Methodology Meets “Proficient” criteria , and recommendations demonstrate exceptio nal insight into the critical elements of the case Discusses an alternative methodology that may have been more appropriate , using specific elements of the case to support the recommendations Discusses an alternative methodology that may have been more app ropriate , using elements of the case to support the recommendation, but discussion is cursory or contains inaccuracies , or supporting elements are illogical Does not discuss an alternative methodology that may have been more appropriate 7.4 Recommendation s: Potential Improvements Meets “Proficient” criteria and makes cogent connections between analysis and potential improvements Identifies potential improvements that could be made by project manager s based on analysis of the case Identifies potential improvements that could be made by project manager s, but identifications are not clearl y based on analysis of the case or use irrelevant elements of the case Does not identify potential improvements that could be made by project manage rs 7.4 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is prese nted in a professional and easy -to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelli ng, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 3.8 Total 100%
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
