Write a reply that interacts with your classmate’s thread and presents a well-reasoned alternative to his or her approach to the issue. You do not have to defend a position that is diametrically opposed to your classmate’s position, but you do need to either defend a position that is significantly different than his/hers or defend the same position in a very different way. If possible, you must reply to a classmate to whom no one else has yet replied. Treat your classmate’s opinion with sensitivity and respect. You may pick either one.
There are similarities and differences between the ethical relativism and the subjective aspects of Christian ethics. Ethical relativism is ethical standards based on what the group you are in. That means it can change. That being said the bible is pretty absolute on what God wants and you would not think it would leave room for subjectivist. There are still subjective ethics in the bible or gray areas that people interpret differently. Like the old testament vs the new testament. This is why we have different denominations and some churches have different rules. Christian ethics may be subjective based on how one interprets it, but it is based off of the same absolute standard, while relativism is just what a group of people think is right and wrong at the time. Relativism should not apply to the bible because it is a set standard for every Christian. ."Conspicuously absent from the Bible’s diverse style of moral reasoning is any appeal to relativism, either cultural (in which morality is determined by the cultural consensus) or moral subjectivism (in which right and wrong are determined by one’s individual taste and preferences). Because of the transcendent source for Christian ethics, it is presumed that morality cannot be confined to the dictates of one’s culture, not to mention a person’s subjective preference." (Rae 2018).
or
2. 1. Is Christian ethics relativistic or absolutist?
First, let me explain what these terms mean to me. Relativistic ethics is determined by the consequences of our actions, rather that be ourselves or the culture we live in, nothing is morally right or wrong. Where absolute ethics is the belief that their are unchanging moral principles that everyone must follow and not tolerate things that go against these principles.
With the first question being is Christian ethics relativistic or absolutist? I find this a very interesting question, as I could argue that it is both. Having been raised up to believe in Christ and The Holy Bible, I’ve been taught that the their are absolute principles or rules to follow, such as the Ten Commandments. Tough shall not kill, tough shall not steal, tough shall not lie, etc. these are absolute commandments given to moses from God. Take murder for an example, everyone can agree it is unethical to take someones life. As Christians we will always say that is a sin and have broken a commandment, but in the case of self-defense we will follow up with you did the right thing or you had to do what you had to do. That being said, didn’t we just take a absolute and turn it into a relativism ethic? Depending on your level of understanding or knowledge of the bible, you would know that the Ten commandments are Old Testament and pertain to the Israelites on their journey to the promised land and are not absolutes today. They are still great ethics to follow to be more Christ like, that being said I can argue that Christians follow relativistic ethics as what applies today.
2. Explain the differences between ethical relativism and the subjective elements in Christian ethics.
The difference between ethical relativism and subjective elements in Christian ethics is that ethical relativism is in part a whole community that believes in the same ethics as it pertains to the time, place and situation. As a community we are taught that the Ten commandments are specifically intended for the Israelites but also is the foundation on which Christianity is built on. But not all commandments apply to the world today in the same way that they applied to the Israelites. Another point of view to look at ethical relativism as a community is that what may be right for one person might not be right for me. This as is determined by many factors and influences on the individual and not as a whole. For instance, I enjoy deer hunting and think it is ethical to deer hunt with a high power rifle. As i do not like for animals to suffer, i believe using such a weapon is ethical to insure that the animal does not suffer. Someone else might believe it is unethical to hunt or use a such a weapon. This is where subjection comes into play. Even though it follows closely to some areas of ethical relativism, I as a individual have a different belief. Just because someone believes it is right or wrong doesn’t make it right or wrong for someone else, just that person.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
