The final product of your research, however you choose to present it, will have four general components:
1. Explain an ethical issue in your community:
* Based on what you have learned through your research, who are the key individuals, organizations, social groups, or other “stakeholders” involved in this ethical issue?
* What competing values or priorities give the situation an ethical valence?
* If you conducted an interview, what does the community member think or feel about the situation? What have they seen work and not work in addressing it (i.e. what is their experiential history with it)?
2. Outline the main arguments and features of two ethical theorists:
* A clear exposition of two ethical theorists’ main arguments.
* What are their priorities as ethicists?
* What do they believe are the most essential features of ethical reasoning?
* How do they develop and deploy their arguments?
3. Analyze your community’s ethical issue using your two chosen ethical theorists:
* An in-depth application of the theories you’ve outlined in #2 to the ethical question you’ve investigated in #1.
* How would these theorists respond to this ethical question?
* How would they critique or refute one another in addressing that ethical question?
4. Construct a debate between the two(2) theorists, allowing them to critique and respond to each other:
* Construct this as a debate, allowing the theorists to respond to one another.
5. Appraise which theorist best resolves the ethical issue:
* Your own assessment of which of these theorists is best able to address the ethical problem you’ve unpacked.
6. Predict what outcomes would result from each ethical theorist’s solution:
* Why is this theory more reliable than the other?
* What positive outcomes can you anticipate from a resolution to this problem based on the theory you have chosen?
* What negative outcomes (or less positive ones) would have proceeded from the alternative?
Your answer must provide an argument for why this theory is more rationally justifiable than the other. Do not rely on “preference” or general intuition about what “seems” better; explain why you have come to the conclusion that you have. The borrowed material of the essay should make up no more than 30% of the essay. Ensure that all sources are cited with both in-text citations and a reference list formatted according to APA guidelines
The post What competing values or priorities give the situation an ethical valence? appeared first on Homework Aider.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
