Directions
For your assignment you will prepare a
proposal. This proposal will be
approximately 10-12 pages. Please follow APA style (6th edition).
Part
I: Background
Determine
the area/field or potential problem for your group:(e.g.,
divorce, substance abuse, transitions, eating disorder, loss-bereavement,
children of divorce, building social skills, stepfamily issues, families of
alcoholics, test-taking anxiety)? Explain this problem and state a clear
rationale for your group.
Conduct
a literature review. Some documents to facilitate your review have been
placed in the course Resources section. You will use the library database
to identify through the literature most important issues faced by group
membersIdentify
possible target areas discovered by past research and practiceUse
at least five cited references (from journal articles) and at least two
relevant websitesDetermine
one of the specialization areas (e.g., task, psychoeducation, counseling
or therapy). Align the specialization area with the potential problem,
which will now be your topic. Specify
the form and the content of at least six group sessions and an objective
for each group meeting. You may use
bullets of subtopic areas or content for each session, but be sure to
explain the focus of the sessions. You may plan to have more than six
group session, but do not need to explain the subtopic areas of more than
six.Part
II: Group Logistics
Describe
the duration of your group with justification to cover the main topic and
allow for change.Define
the number of participants with a rationale for who to include and who to
exclude. List criteria such as gender, cognitive ability, maturity,
duration of issue, frequency of issue, intensity of issue, acceptance
and/or completion of issue.Describe
anticipated changes as a result of members’ participation.Identify
potential obstacles in your topic area.Explain
how you would address individual goals and goals of the group as a whole
(e.g., coaching, role play, support for and opportunity to transfer
learning to real life)?Part
III: Group Leadership, Theory, and Techniques
Identify
your theoretical orientation and any special considerations for the group.What
are your personal leadership qualities? What are some of your weaknesses?Explain
if this group will be facilitated only by you, or if you will use a
co-leader and why.What
are some strengths of the theory from which you will work and benefits for
group members? What are some limitations?How
might you evaluate the group at the closing? Will you have follow-up? Why
or why not?Part
IV: Flyer
Create
a one-page flyer that advertises your group. Include only the information
necessary to recruit members: Title of group, purpose, meeting times and
place, contact information. References
Be
sure to cite sources in APA 6th edition (2010) style guidelines and include a
reference list at the conclusion of your reflection manuscript. Use at least
two sources in addition to your textbook.
Rubric
This assignment is worth 200 points for being
complete and submitted on time.
Assignment
Rubric
Category
Points
Part I 100 Points
100-90
89-80
79-50
49-0
10 Points
Potential problem for group explained
with details; specialization area aligned with potential problem.
Potential
problem for group explained with few details; specialization area aligned
with potential problem.
Little
discussion of potential problem.
Lack of
discussion and not areas aligned.
10 Points
Rationale was given with clarity for
conducting this type of group/topic.
Rationale
was given but was not clear.
Rationale
was vague.
Lack of
rationale.
50 Points
Literature review comprised five
journal article references; Literature review comprised two relevant websites
and was clearly presented.
Literature
review lacked all criteria.
Literature
review did not include more than two articles and two websites.
Literature
review was poorly constructed and lacked citations.
30 Points
A minimum of six group meetings were
listed with content of sessions with details.
Six meetings
were discussed but lacked a common thread.
Less than
six meeting were discussed and lacked a common thread.
Meetings
were vague and lacked a common thread or were not discussed at all.
Part II 50 Points
50-40
39-30
29-20
19-0
5 Points
Duration of group included a rationale.
Duration was
presented and group rationale was presented without clarity.
Durations
and rationale were not clear.
No duration
and no group rationale was presented.
5 Points
Number of participants presented with screening discussion of all
seven items: rationale for: gender, cognitive ability, maturity, duration of
issue, frequency of issue, intensity of issue, acceptance and/or completion
of issue.
Number of
participants presented with screening discussion of five or six items.
Number of
participants presented with screening discussion of all three or four items.
Number of
participants presented with screening discussion missing or vague.
5 Points
Anticipated changes were explained with clarity
and detail. .
Anticipated
changes were discussed only briefly.
Anticipated
changes were not clear.
Did not
discuss anticipated changes.
5 Points
Potential obstacles were explained with details.
Potential
obstacles were explained briefly.
Vague
explanation of obstacles.
Did not
discuss obstacles.
5 Points
Both potential individual goals and group goals
were thoroughly developed with details.
Both potential individual goals and group goals
were discussed but lacked clarity.
Only one
type of goal discussed.
Goals were
not discussed.
10 Points
Theoretical orientation and personal leadership qualities included a
discussion of strength and weaknesses.
Theoretical orientation and personal leadership qualities included little
discussion of strength and weaknesses.
Theoretical orientation and personal leadership qualities included no
discussion of strength and weaknesses.
No
discussion of theory.
5 Points
Leadership (single or co) was discussed with
rationale.
Leadership
(single or co) was discussed with little rationale.
Leadership
(single or co) was discussed with no rationale.
No
discussion of leadership.
10 Points
Evaluation was discussed with detailed explanation.
Evaluation was discussed with little explanation.
Evaluation was discussed with no explanation.
No
discussion of evaluation.
30-20
19-15
14-10
9-0
Part III
30 Points
Flyer was attached to report and included all of the following:
Title of group, purpose, meeting times and place, contact information with
creativity and use of graphics.
Flyer is
presented with less than all criteria but is creative and uses graphics.
Flyer is
presented with less than all criteria.
Flyer is
presented with less than all criteria and is not creative and does not use
graphics.
25-20
19-15
14-10
9-0
Mechanics
10 points
No
grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
Almost no
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors
Many
grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors
Numerous
grammatical and punctuation errors
Sources
10 Points
All sources
are accurately documented in APA format
All sources
are accurately documented, but a few are not in APA format
Some sources
are not accurately documented
Numerous
sources are not documented accurately and there is not a format used
“WE’VE HAD A GOOD SUCCESS RATE ON THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH HOMEWORK AIDER AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT”
The post CNDV 5312 Group Theories and Techniques appeared first on Homeworkaider.
What Students Are Saying About Us
.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"
.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."
"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"
