Consider the following case and explain why the case should or should not be dismissed.  

                                                                                        



      CASE




Jeannie and Jim Khamee own a laundromat in State A. One day, Jim was working on a dryer and had to remove the drum. When he replaced it, he accidentally left a small screwdriver inside. That evening, Grace, a nearby resident in a nearby border city of State B, came in and was in a hurry. She used the dryer on the high-heat setting, hoping to speed up the drying of her clothes, but did not notice the screwdriver in the dryer. When she reached in to pull out her clothing, she wrapped her hand around the screwdriver, suffering third-degree burns on her palm. When she burned her hand, she jumped back and fell, striking her head on the floor. She went home, but a few hours later went to a hospital in State B. She was diagnosed as having a traumatic brain injury.

Grace was a commercial artist, and the injuries prevented her from a full return to work for more than a year. Fifteen months after the accident, Grace was introduced to the laundromats owners in a social setting. She told them what had happened. They expressed their condolences but offered no more information. They did offer to help with some of the medical bills because the injuries occurred on their property. They told her they would do what they could but that there had been no liability insurance on the property at the time of the accident. A few weeks later, Grace provided them with the remaining unpaid medical bills of $2,500, along with documentation of bills she had paid personally and through health insurance. The amount was more than $37,000. Grace had also lost income and suffered permanent scarring.

Approximately four months after the meeting, the owners sent Grace a check for $2,500 along with a letter stating that they were sorry about the accident and felt it only right to help pay her damages. Grace cashed the check. She wrote to the Khamees and asked whether they intended to pay the other $37,000 in bills. They responded that they would like to help but needed time to get the money together. Despite subsequent letters from Grace, she heard no more from them. Grace sought legal counsel approximately one month after the two-year statute of limitations in State A (the site of the laundromat) had expired. An investigation discovered that the laundromat had been closed for equipment repairs and cleaning of all units on the day of the accident until shortly before Grace arrived.

The case was brought against Jim and Jeannie Khamee in State B, where the statute of limitations was three years. In the time since the accident, though, Grace had moved to State A. The Khamees attorney responded with claims that the statute of limitations had run in the state where the case occurred and where Grace now resided (State A), and further that there was no such person as Jim Khamee who owned the laundromat. Graces attorney discovered that the owners real given name was Mozembiqueno; he only went by the more American name of Jim for convenience. However, only legal documents reflected this, and at all other times, he was known publicly as Jim Khamee.


What Students Are Saying About Us

.......... Customer ID: 12*** | Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"Honestly, I was afraid to send my paper to you, but you proved you are a trustworthy service. My essay was done in less than a day, and I received a brilliant piece. I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first 🙂 Great job, thank you!"

.......... Customer ID: 11***| Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
"This company is the best there is. They saved me so many times, I cannot even keep count. Now I recommend it to all my friends, and none of them have complained about it. The writers here are excellent."


"Order a custom Paper on Similar Assignment at essayfount.com! No Plagiarism! Enjoy 20% Discount!"